The making of the viral video film continues. Real progress has been made, but the process is still unbearably slow. The biggest challenge has been getting my cast and equipment in order. My original way to obtain a camera fell through, so i obtained a different camera through the media department at school. Its another film/digital hybrid camera that just about fits in the palm of my hand.
My crew and I shot footage on location for about 5 hours today. Poor guys, I ran em pretty raw, taking repeat footage of the same sequences over and over again. We shot footage for scene 2 and 3 in my 4 scene viral project, "The Information Genie," including alternate footage for a more "G" rated version. This is the first video project I've ever done from a production side, and the first video project ever for my main lead, so it was a learning experience.
We had problems from the get go. The audio wasn't very good on the camera, so I pretty much had the actors shouting for a lot of the shots. The film location that I scouted out earlier actually ended being a poor location to film, but by the time we realized that we had committed to location. There was a lot of pedestrian traffic and screaming children running up to us that bogged the process down greatly and forced about 25 retakes.
In the end though, I got some pretty good shots for the project. Tomorrow they will be loaded onto a digital format (a process which requires a fire cable. The cable i have, but my laptop doesn't have a port for it! Work computers once again to the rescue!) and the process of editing these scenes can begin!
With half the physical work done, a date just has to be set up to film scenes 1 and 4: both office scenes. I got permission to film on an office location, so shooting should begin sometime the week after next for the last of the filming. The digital props for the scenes are crafted, including a fake "search engine" web page called "Mergle" and a fully crafted information broker web form (hand written HTML, never though i coulda done that!) This is turning out to be an awful lot of work, but i think it will be worth it in the end.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Friday, November 2, 2007
Puss in Books
Very interesting documentary on library cats. I watched this a few days ago and thought it was pretty good. The interviewees range from the stereotypical "shhhsh!" librarians to the "crazy cat loving" librarians to more. The company that produced this documentary can be found here at http://www.ironfrog.com/
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Scary Janes echoes
It seems this week is reference centric. For those that may have not read this, i offer an interesting article on the reference interview-do's and common mistakes:
Fox, Theodora. 2005. The lost art of the reference interview. One-Person Library 22(5): 3-5. Accessed LISA 25 October 2007.
LISA just has the abstract, and I recieved my copy of this article through a coworker, but it's definately worth checking out.
On to Jones, and his The Future of Reference Services Papers. Specifically, i wanted to talk about his "prediction" of ready reference. For years now I've seen the ready reference section at our library shrink from a shelf all on-its-own into a few small books. No doubt that popular search engines are cutting into the questions that ready reference had answers. Despite this, I found Jone's opinions on this matter quite comforting.
As technology improves, answers to quick questions become more available. I'm sure every student in this program whose focus is reference has been asked how they are going to compete with Google and others. The truth is, as Jones puts out, is that they don't compete.
While ready-reference may fade away, reference will continue to live on. At least, that's how I see it. Especially in an academic environment where convenience and speed must take a backseat to quality to insure good marks. Academia is a controlled enviroment that allows this, and will support the reference structure for years to come.
Fox, Theodora. 2005. The lost art of the reference interview. One-Person Library 22(5): 3-5. Accessed LISA 25 October 2007.
LISA just has the abstract, and I recieved my copy of this article through a coworker, but it's definately worth checking out.
On to Jones, and his The Future of Reference Services Papers. Specifically, i wanted to talk about his "prediction" of ready reference. For years now I've seen the ready reference section at our library shrink from a shelf all on-its-own into a few small books. No doubt that popular search engines are cutting into the questions that ready reference had answers. Despite this, I found Jone's opinions on this matter quite comforting.
As technology improves, answers to quick questions become more available. I'm sure every student in this program whose focus is reference has been asked how they are going to compete with Google and others. The truth is, as Jones puts out, is that they don't compete.
While ready-reference may fade away, reference will continue to live on. At least, that's how I see it. Especially in an academic environment where convenience and speed must take a backseat to quality to insure good marks. Academia is a controlled enviroment that allows this, and will support the reference structure for years to come.
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Incidently......
Staying Google free is Really, really hard when the OU website is powered by the damn thing, and so, aparently, is this blog. I'll be looking for a new home for this blog in the future. I guess i can just stay off the ou website and link up straight to D2L...
What a Day!
Sometimes it's fun to let my readers into some personal nuggets before jumping right in to Library orientated materials. I hope it keeps people coming back to read here!
Turns out today I have plenty of free time to blog. My car got busted into last night. The S.O.B. punched my lock in and stole my CD player. I hope he (or she) electrocutes himself with it. And with the heating unit on the fritz, i have plenty of time to set around and blog while i wait for the repair guy.
I've been on a Google free diet for almost 6 days on my computer. Believe me, its hard to do. Google has its fingers in sooo much stuff. Google is a great engine, but I disagree with their privacy policies, or lack thereof, really. And the more I read about em the more I grow wary of the "Don't be evil" giant. For those who wish to rid themselves of Google's gathering tendrils, I have four suggestions:
1. Use search engines that protect your privacy. Ixquick.com wipes their database of search results every 48 hours. Ixquick is a meta-search engine, actually. It crawls other search engines. Clusty.com is nice too. They don't track the IPs of who uses their engine, and they have a feature that organizes similiar results into "clusters," which is pretty swanky. No crawling through one big list to find the pages you want.
2. Beware the Firefox. Firefox is heavily in bed with Google, as is evident by the Google search engine appearing on the firefox homepage by default. However, Mozilla-firefox is still independent... for now. There is some literature suggesting that Firefox eventually plans to stream an adbanner in the actual browser, all supplied with specially tailored ads from Google. The sources I've seen so far aren't terribly credible, so i wouldn't freak over this one yet, but its something to keep an eye on. My advice, get comfortable with a new browser now.
3. Delete the Google Cookie. Blocking it doesn't do much good from my experience, so just delete it when it pops on your computer and try to stay off Google. This damn cookie takes two years to expire, and if you use Google services that require log in, the cookie associates your new location with the old one and continues to compile information on you.
4. Speaking of Google services, avoid Gmail. Google saves every email you send or receive. Even if you delete the email, Google keeps it. And, with email no longer being a protected form of correspondence, they can pretty much do what they want with it.
Since I went Google-free and decided to protect my privacy I've gotten a lotta crap to the tune of "Only someone who has something to hide protects their privacy." Seems most people don't understand the importance of privacy in their lives- to information searching, democratic processes, etc. I don't want someone reading my mind- which is essentially what happens when someone reads a list of search results.
Turns out today I have plenty of free time to blog. My car got busted into last night. The S.O.B. punched my lock in and stole my CD player. I hope he (or she) electrocutes himself with it. And with the heating unit on the fritz, i have plenty of time to set around and blog while i wait for the repair guy.
I've been on a Google free diet for almost 6 days on my computer. Believe me, its hard to do. Google has its fingers in sooo much stuff. Google is a great engine, but I disagree with their privacy policies, or lack thereof, really. And the more I read about em the more I grow wary of the "Don't be evil" giant. For those who wish to rid themselves of Google's gathering tendrils, I have four suggestions:
1. Use search engines that protect your privacy. Ixquick.com wipes their database of search results every 48 hours. Ixquick is a meta-search engine, actually. It crawls other search engines. Clusty.com is nice too. They don't track the IPs of who uses their engine, and they have a feature that organizes similiar results into "clusters," which is pretty swanky. No crawling through one big list to find the pages you want.
2. Beware the Firefox. Firefox is heavily in bed with Google, as is evident by the Google search engine appearing on the firefox homepage by default. However, Mozilla-firefox is still independent... for now. There is some literature suggesting that Firefox eventually plans to stream an adbanner in the actual browser, all supplied with specially tailored ads from Google. The sources I've seen so far aren't terribly credible, so i wouldn't freak over this one yet, but its something to keep an eye on. My advice, get comfortable with a new browser now.
3. Delete the Google Cookie. Blocking it doesn't do much good from my experience, so just delete it when it pops on your computer and try to stay off Google. This damn cookie takes two years to expire, and if you use Google services that require log in, the cookie associates your new location with the old one and continues to compile information on you.
4. Speaking of Google services, avoid Gmail. Google saves every email you send or receive. Even if you delete the email, Google keeps it. And, with email no longer being a protected form of correspondence, they can pretty much do what they want with it.
Since I went Google-free and decided to protect my privacy I've gotten a lotta crap to the tune of "Only someone who has something to hide protects their privacy." Seems most people don't understand the importance of privacy in their lives- to information searching, democratic processes, etc. I don't want someone reading my mind- which is essentially what happens when someone reads a list of search results.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
a blast from last week.
I'll try to keep this blog short. I was browsing some other blogs in the LM/LIS 5433 class and someone had blogged about the phenomenon that if a blog is too long no one will finish it.
This blog is a blast from the past because it highlights some feelings on last week's readings, specifically the Greenberg article. I thought his idea on how to go about building a structure for metadata schemes was interesting, but did anyone else feel that he was being intentionally vague and apologetic?
Its just a pet peeve with me. I like it when people take a hard position on academic issues. His entire closing statement in that article felt wishy-washy, and left me feeling like i had wasted my time with the read. I wanted hard guidance on how to deal with the burgeoning number of meta-data schemes, and he didn't deliver.
Next posting: Feelings on this week's reads! I'll try to be more positive!
This blog is a blast from the past because it highlights some feelings on last week's readings, specifically the Greenberg article. I thought his idea on how to go about building a structure for metadata schemes was interesting, but did anyone else feel that he was being intentionally vague and apologetic?
Its just a pet peeve with me. I like it when people take a hard position on academic issues. His entire closing statement in that article felt wishy-washy, and left me feeling like i had wasted my time with the read. I wanted hard guidance on how to deal with the burgeoning number of meta-data schemes, and he didn't deliver.
Next posting: Feelings on this week's reads! I'll try to be more positive!
Monday, October 8, 2007
Wiki Time!
Its that time. Its time to wiki. I love wikis. They are such a double-sided sword. On one hand, you have a mass contributing knowledge effort that allows everyone a democratic chance to share their knowledge or post what they have found. For people who like odd-ball topics like me, wikis offer a source to learn where encyclopedias drop the ball. On the other hand, there are a lot of mischievous trolls out there who would like nothing more than to misinform the general public. But i digress.
Soon i will begin editing at this URL:
http://libsuccess.org/index.php?title=Staff_Training
That wiki page is pretty darn bare. I intend to edit in tips for libraries based off my 4 years experience, knowledge from class, and professional people i interview. Specifically, I'd like to focus in on tips for the concept of the "floating librarian," because there doesn't seem to be much information at all out there on this particular position. Believe me, i looked.
Soon i will begin editing at this URL:
http://libsuccess.org/index.php?title=Staff_Training
That wiki page is pretty darn bare. I intend to edit in tips for libraries based off my 4 years experience, knowledge from class, and professional people i interview. Specifically, I'd like to focus in on tips for the concept of the "floating librarian," because there doesn't seem to be much information at all out there on this particular position. Believe me, i looked.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)